Universal GPU Block Review – NV GTX480

Swiftech MCW60 Rev2

The Swiftech MCW60 has been around for quite a while and has been extremely popular over the years. I was not able to get my hands on an original but was able to score a used Rev2 (or Version 2) thanks to forum sales. The MCW60 Rev2 is a spin-off of the Apogee GT CPU block sharing an identical base design. Like the Apogee GT, the MCW60 has significant staying power and I continue to see MCW60′s in use, which is why we had to have one for our roundup. Part of the staying power is the ability to change mount plates, which Swiftech releases when NV or AMD/ATI introduce new spacing, letting the MCW60 continue to live on. Mount plate changes are extremely simple, just four allen screws and the plate comes off, and you do not need to take the block fully apart. A few other notable features/design choices are the stepped base helping with contact to the GPU core/IHS and the large barb ports. Now those barb ports are recessed, so a larger/fatter o-ring may be required if you are using non-Swiftech barbs.

Swiftech MCW60 Rev2 Swiftech MCW60 Rev2 inlet/outlet ports The Swiftech approach to compatibility Closeup of the MCW60 stepped base
Cracking open the MCW60 a closer view of the MCW60 internals, based off the Apogee GT Swiftech MCW60 Rev2 mounted to our MSI NVGTX480

Mounting and installation, this followed Swiftech tradition and was a breeze even though there are a few steps. Swiftech uses M2.5 screws through the backside of the card held in place by washers and nuts. Get the block onto the posts and then use the springs, plastic standoffs and thumbnuts to secure the block to the card… there, that is it. This static post mounting system is just great for multiple mounts and ensuring you get adequate pressure on the GPU core.

Swiftech MCW80

Keeping with running theme of universal GPU blocks born from their CPU block pedigree, the MCW80 was released shortly after the Apogee XT. The MCW80 shares an extensive pin array, but uses a vastly different flow pattern, sporting a cross pattern versus the center shot found on the XT. Additionally, the chamfered inlet/outlet is gone from the MCW60, which may contribute to the restriction numbers we will see later. A feature Swiftech carried over from the MCW60 to the MCW80 is the mount system and changeable mount plates. I used the same G80 plate on the MCW80 that I did for the MCW60 for testing. One thing that was improved on the MCW80 is the barb ports do not interfere with the screws when changing plates, which was not really a big problem anyway. One last item to point out, Swiftech went with a flat base for the MCW80 versus the step, which I personally would have like to see the stepped base carried over to the MCW80.

Swiftech MCW80 contents Swiftech MCW80 contents Swiftech MCW80 Swiftech MCW80 flat base
Swiftech MCW80 cracked open Swiftech MCW80 pin matrix closeup Swiftech MCW80 mounted to our MSI NVGTX480

Mounting and installation wise, the process is the exact same for the MCW80 as it is for the MCW60, so no need to repeat the process here. I will point out that Swiftech does include a backplate for G92, but not for G200 or G80. Rather disappointed here, because I would have much preferred a backplate for both MCW60 and the MCW80.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Comments

Posted On
Jul 23, 2012
Posted By
PunkNugget

Can someone tell me the difference between the EK Supreme HF-V P1 and the HF-V P4 in as much detail as you can as I could not find anything that explained the difference between the two? Thank you… :-)

Posted On
Mar 26, 2011
Posted By
J_M

Great read as usual, thanks for all your hard work, skinnee. I have been hoping for a GPU block roundup and am glad I waited for you; I was very close to pulling the trigger on the disappointing MCW80.

I am considering modding a Dtek Fusion (V1) for my 480 – any thoughts?

Posted On
Mar 26, 2011
Posted By
Eric (Vapor) Hassett

Fuzion V1 GPU or CPU?

GPU I’m not sure if there’s a way to mod for compatibility–you’d need a bracket at least larger than the GF100 mounting hole size.

CPU version will be a very tight fit (75mm diagonally, same as the Supreme HF), but should be possible with a modded Pro-Mount kit and using the washers and nuts on the rear of the card.

Posted On
Mar 22, 2011
Posted By
vivithemage

Thanks a lot for this, glad I got my XSPC FC for my 6950′s!

Posted On
Mar 22, 2011
Posted By
Batou

Had some laugh at this results, i could not believe that a EK supreme modded would have been able to perform better than other VGA blocks. Maybe because i’m new to SL :) … never saw something like this so far. Good job guys here. EK now has to sell supreme HF modded for all of us! Question, actually does a full VGA cover block perform better than “little” blocks like the ones in this article? I never had the opportunity to watercool my VGA so far, but i’m thinking about it for my next build.

Posted On
Mar 22, 2011
Posted By
Cameron (skinnee) Shears

Three issues with making the new style CPU HF for a GPU:
1) it would only be compatible with GTX470/480/570/580;
2) it’s a really tight fit…if the block were ~1-2mm larger diagonally, it wouldn’t fit even GF100/GF110 cores (the largest out there)–blocks don’t magically grow, but it doesn’t bode well for future card compatibility;
3) because of the size, new-style Supreme CPU HFs simply won’t fit unless the head of the screw were extremely tiny–the corner of the block is extremely close to the mounting hole position.

The EK Full Cover block is included in the test results, it’s the bright red one and labeled EK FC480 Nickel.

Posted On
Mar 22, 2011
Posted By
Batou

Quote: The EK Full Cover block is included in the test results, it’s the bright red one and labeled EK FC480 Nickel.
Yup, you’re right, today i didn’t have time while working to read all the review as i finally did now :p
Like a spy at work i just watched results! Sorry

Posted On
Mar 22, 2011
Posted By
Church

> 1) it would only be compatible with GTX470/480/570/580
Skinnee: But aren’t those mounting plates sold as separate spares aswell – so maybe it’s not THAT big of a drawback?
( ekwb shop > blocks > block parts > mounting plates )

Posted On
Mar 22, 2011
Posted By
Eric (Vapor) Hassett

He means it would be too big to mount on any card with mounting holes closer together than a GTX470/480/570/580 :)

Look how close the mounting holes are to the corner of the block.

Posted On
Mar 23, 2011
Posted By
Church

> He means it would be too big to mount on any card with mounting holes closer together than a GTX470/480/570/580
Vapor: Hmm, how about turning block diagonally? Though then probably one would need to make mounting plate from ground up, instead of cutting/drilling stock one.

Posted On
Mar 23, 2011
Posted By
Cameron (skinnee) Shears

What mount plate is there to modify for a diagonal orientation? Lets not go off the deep end trying to get a CPU block mounted to a GPU, the HF-V really isn’t a viable product but was a fun experiment thanks to Vapor Arts and Crafts. :)

Posted On
Mar 22, 2011
Posted By
pokazene_maslo

Very nice roundup, thanks skinnee!
one thing that I have on my mind: what about making a custom EK VGA supreme HF jet plate that will be wider to force water to flow longer through the fins and post results?

Posted On
Mar 22, 2011
Posted By
Cameron (skinnee) Shears

Presently, EK does not have blank or additional jet plates for the VGA HF. But, if you look at the results from the HF-V P1 and HF-V P4 there is not much to be gained thermally on GPU’s with a different jet plate. The plate EK has in the VGA HF now is probably the least restrictive they could make, so I doubt any gains could be had on the restriction side either. Plus, the effort towards making a custom jet plate looks to be troublesome without EK providing blanks.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Login