Now that we have all of the methodology, specification and data explanation documented and detailed lets get on with what you all are looking for…the results.
Here is the main chart for bringing all of the logged data in and using this data to calculate Water Avg-Air In, and C/W. Now this is a change from the method we used previously. We used to just use water outlet averaged temperature in the calculation, but now we are using the loop water average in the calculation. This change was brought on by a brave fact finding mission by Martinm210. I have mixed feelings about the use of loop average versus water out, but the testing norm has been changed and I will following the community testing standard. Another column you see in the table is Air Capacity Used, this column shows the rise in air temperature relative to the water temperature.
We did not run into any problems with water temperatures reaching my safety shutoff, which is always a good thing. We have the full 12 tests and corresponding data to in the mix.
With the explanation out of the way, the test data show can begin.
Now for the performance numbers and muscle flexing portion of the program…This chart plots the Water Avg-Air In Temperature or Delta versus the Heat Load applied. This chart is the most useful in estimating the Delta for a given heat load (watts) to be applied to the radiator. Simply locate the wattage on the X axis and move up to find the Delta for a given fan speed. Add this delta to your ambient temperature, and that is what you can expect for a loop water temperature.
For information on calculating heat load for your loop here are two resources I have used in the past. Another method I have used in the past is to Google search TDP for a specific component, that should also help in estimating the heat load that will be in the loop for a specific component. The primary one for me is linked below, they take a lot of the google searching out of the equation and break everything down to just the numbers you need.
Please remember, calculating the power consumption and using that as heat load is not exact and is only an estimate. This estimate will be higher than actual heat load applied as you do transfer some heat to the air circulating in your case around the components. How much difference I cannot begin to speculate, but I just want to state that it is only an estimate and not an exact specification.
Now that we have looked at the plotted results, lets apply the C/W results with a given Delta (Water Avg-Air In) to find how much wattage can the radiator dissipate. Below is the data table for calculations of Deltas of 15º, 10º, 5º and 2º. Here is my classifications for those deltas.
Here are the plotted C/W results over the fan RPM range, as you can see the results do follow close to a plotted trendline. This trendline might not mean much to you, but to me the trend line helps me see that my testing and resultant data are accurate. Additionally, if you plan on running your fans at a speed other than the ones I tested here is another reference point to estimate the results you will see.
With the C/W calculated, we can apply a specified wattage to give us the watts dissipated for our RPM range. This chart is just the plotted results for a 10º Delta or Average Performance from the data table in the beginning of this section. I initially expected higher numbers in the 600-1400RPM range, but after measuring the FPI I am not surprised by the numbers. I for some reason thought the TFC’s were 10 FPI…guess I should have verified that.
Here are the plotted results for a 5º Delta or High Performance from the data table in the beginning of this section. The 5ºC numbers in the mid speed fan range is where the 12 FPI and dual thickness start to outpace the slim and lower FPI radiators.
Here are the plotted results for a 2º Delta or Ultra Performance from the data table in the beginning of this section. This chart is purely to show what wattages and fan speeds you need to get really close to ambient water temps. I typically say this delta is not going to happen for most out there, but high speed fan numbers are impressive once again.